Essay on Conflict and Communication - 1267 Words

Conflict and Communication Conflict can happen anytime of your life, it will happen matter you want it or not. In addition, it can have both negative and positive impacts for our relationship (Gudykunst, 2004). According to Yi-Feng 2007, she mentions that conflict is â€Å"incompatible activities, where one person’s actions are interfering, obstructing, or in other ways making the behavior of another less effective†. In term of nature of conflict, conflict is a cause which happens by threatened human needs problem (Kelman, 2002). The sources of conflict can divide into three things, there are misinterpret, disagree and perceptions of incompatibilities (Roloff, 1987). In addition, in term of nature of nature of conflict, conflict can develop in†¦show more content†¦In addition the way of people approach to managing conflict is depend on culture and ethnic (Ting-Toomey, 1985). For example, Asian use avoiding, integrating and obliging to approach but European and American use dominating. In term of face and conflict, we can divide in two parts. Firstly, cultural differences in face-concerns, Moriska and Gudykunst 1994 mention that â€Å"face in collectivistic cultures is based on the interdependent self construal†. In this case, Members of individualistic cultures attention to self-face maintenance more than members of collectivistic cultures, however, Members of collectivistic cultures attention to other-face more than members of individualistic culture (Ting-Toomey Kurogi, 1998). In term of face management, face work tactics are the strategies used to solve problem between others face and self-face when conflicts are managed (Oetzel et al, 1999). In addition, the politeness is need when we do something attract to the other face (Brown Levinson, 1987). Secondly, in term of ethnic difference in face-concerns, when people have different ethnic it can be concerns with face because people have different identity and it easy to threaten the other face (Kwan Sod owsky, 1997). However, in each culture and ethnic have both different and similar in itself. Lastly, in term of Managing Conflict, according to Ting-Toomey 2004 mentions that â€Å"WithoutShow MoreRelatedCommunication, Conflict, And Conflict1453 Words   |  6 Pages Communication and Conflict Margarita Vela COM325: Communication Conflict Instructor: Kenneth Newton March 10, 2015 Communication and Conflict Conflict is a contest or struggle between individuals with opposing values, beliefs, needs, goals, and ideas. On teams, conflict is inevitable; on the other hand, the conflict’s outcomes are not predetermined. Conflict may escalate and result in nonproductive outcomes, or it may be beneficially resolved and lead to quality outcomes (Cahn AbigailRead MoreCommunication and Conflict1400 Words   |  6 PagesIn today s workforce communication and conflict resolution are paramount to a successful organization. As with any leadership trait, these skills must be developed and regularly practiced by leaders. There are many skills involved in both the communication process as well as with conflict resolution. According to Schermerhorn, the communication process is a simple process of sending and receiving messages with attached meaning (2005). The process is further defined by having three elements, thoseRead MoreCommunication Conflict Essay1577 Words   |  7 PagesCM310:Communica tion Conflict Final Project Communication Conflict Final Project The Nature of Power in Conflict: Power can be defined in many ways. Most simply, it is the ability to get what you want. Power is a fundamental concept in any conflict. The nature of that power can depend upon how the power is distributed, how it is viewed, and how it is used. There can be power struggles between those that feel very powerful and those that feel thatRead MoreConflict As A Communication Problem952 Words   |  4 PagesConflict is a disagreement between two or more parties who perceive that they have incompatible concerns. An action by one party is perceived as preventing or interfering with the goals, needs, or actions of another party leads to conflict. Conflicts can arise due to a variety of organisational experiences, such as differences in the interpretation of facts, negative feelings, differences of values and philosophies, or disputes over shared resources (Hunsaker and Alessandra, 2008). From a personalRead MoreTypes of Conflict in Communication601 Words   |  2 Pages1. There are five types of conflict. These are misunderstanding-miscommunication; disregard or disrespect for other people; conflicting egos; impatience; and fear and insecurity over loss of control. In the health care setting, conflicting egos and impatience are probably the tw o most likely in that order. In particular, conflicts can occur among physicians and administrative staff or between physicians or involving nurses as well. Many people in the health care setting are experts in their fieldsRead MoreCommunication And Conflict Resolution Within Communications1751 Words   |  8 PagesSanders Lavell Capstone Research paper 8/8/2016 Communication Conflict Resolution While introducing the study of conflict resolution within communications it is extremely vital for us as human beings to be able to seek out the defiance and or uncivil disobedience so that then he or she may begin to eliminate the arising communicative conflict. The way conflict resolution works is by identifying the problem then next is to evaluate why such circumstances are so, and finally he or she should seekRead MoreFamily Conflict Communication : Food And Foster Families : Care, Communication, And Conflict1563 Words   |  7 PagesResearch Paper 2 – Family Conflict Communication Food in Foster Families: Care, Communication, and Conflict Rees’s article in Children Society from 2012 contrasts the differences foster children experience between the food they are provided by their families and the relationship they have with their birth family and foster family because of it. It discusses the way children are provided with food can lessen the amount of conflict they feel is centered on them within their family. The study wasRead MoreCommunication Networks, Conflict Management, And Crisis Communication1261 Words   |  6 Pages to narrow the list, I decided to address the three ideas that will have the most immediate impact in my life: communication networks, conflict management, and crisis communication. Communication Networks Our discussion of communication networks brought clarity to the communication paths in my business environment. With church leadership or basketball team leadership, the communication paths from leaders to participants are clear because the organizations have flat structures with few managementRead MoreConflict Management : Effective Communication1276 Words   |  6 PagesConflict Management: Effective Communication In Critical Areas Everyday nurses are confronted with responsibilities; tasks and providing care for their patients in environments that require cooperation, and most importantly communication. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Emergency Room (ER) where I work, tensions, acuity and a plethora of other stressors tend to run high. In these critical areas conflicts between co-workers, patients and families can occur rapidly and frequently. In reading DialogueRead More Poor Communications and Conflict Essay1586 Words   |  7 Pages Is most conflict in an organisation is caused by poor communication? If we had perfect communication would conflict cease? Consider for example, an e-mail asking for some information â€Å"yesterday† to stress how important this request is. The sender thinks e-mails are great as they travel at the speed of light and spell things out in black amp; white. The recipient may consider that if its in a e-mail then it can’t be that urgent because servers can loose, misdirect or delay an e-mails transmission

The Zombie Apocalypse Revealing the Monster Essay

Death is the scariest part of living. Humanity has always been acutely aware of this horrible inevitability, and as a result of this almost near obsession with mortality certain practices, precautions, and even religions have been developed to ease the weary minds on death. Self- preservation, preparedness and survival motivate almost faction of human interest and behavior but becoming prepared for the conceivable anything and asking all the â€Å"what if† questions in the world still might not save humanity when analyzing how many devastating catastrophes can essentially wipe out life on this planet with ease. Not hard to imagine, mass extinction in history has happened at least five times estimated as far back as 440 million years ago at the†¦show more content†¦Haitian clergy believe that creating zombies or zombification is sorcery, while doctors believe it is a result of poisoning. Vodoo sorcerers use a powdery substance called â€Å"Coupe Poudre†, discove red by anthropologist Wade Davis when he traveled to Haiti. This substance Davis discovered, contained a mixture of toxins from a various cane toad, an irritant collected from a Hyla tree frog species and some contained small amounts of the deadly neurotoxin tetrodoxin produced by many organisms but most commonly found in the puffer fish. Tetrodoxin if ingested causes death by paralysis but if given in a smaller less lethal dose, the victims mimic a â€Å"dead like† state, reduce heart rate and metabolic activity put the subject in a completely paralyzed state, yet fully conscious. Davis concluded that the irritant first causes small wounds on the skins surface allowing the tetrodoxin to become released into the bloodstream. Once the victim presents with these symptoms they are usually pronounced dead and buried alive. A few days later the sorcerer would return to the grave and exhume the body. The sorcerer then administers another cocktail of Atrophine and Scopolamine, a tox ic hallucinogenic that causes delirium and disorientation. Vudon sorcerers would then enslave the victims and it is said that the zombification process was punishment for those who violated laws in a place during that time (Thomas). These may not be the zombies we all know andShow MoreRelatedZombie Movies And The Film Night Of The Living Dead 1970 Words   |  8 Pages Ever since the first zombie movie was created in 1932, there has been a constant rise of zombie appearances in popular media. Like with all monsters, the majority of zombie media aimed to represent a certain aspect throughout the society in question. Whereas vampires represented romanticism and Dracula represented how a certain social group was viewed during a certain time period, zombies in Romero’s â€Å"Night of the Living Dead† aimed to create a situation whereby a group of people had to survive

Conflict Mediation and Peacemaking Free Essays

Conflict Resolution and Peacemaking Social Psychology-PSY/400 August 16, 2010 Matt Diggs Conflict Resolution and Peacemaking Conflict resolution is used in a variety of ways and includes many elements. The goal in this paper is analyze the chosen article for the elements of conflict resolution and peacemaking discussed by David G. Myers in his Social Psychology textbook and to draw parallels. We will write a custom essay sample on Conflict Mediation and Peacemaking or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Article: The Critical Role of Conflict Resolution in Teams: A Close Look at the Links Between Conflict Type, Conflict Management Strategies, and Team Outcomes, by Kristin J. Behfar, Randall S. Peterson, Elizabeth A. Mannix and William M. K. Trochim The idea was to find which conflict resolution strategies helped teams be the most successful in his or her current team and what each team experience brings to the next team experience. The study focuses on group satisfaction and performance based on how the team members handle conflict that arises throughout the experience and which conflict resolution strategies provided the team with the most success in both the project given and the social aspect. The groups were newly formed with no assigned leader to ensure the group developed the conflict resolution strategies.Elements of Conflict Resolution Cause of Conflict The examples of what causes conflict given in the article are similar to that of the textbook. Though the textbook outlines the causes for simpler reading the article makes it clear what elements may cause conflict. The textbook outlines social dilemmas, competition, perceived injustice, and misinterpretations as causes of conflicts, the examples in the article talk about how the conflicts can manifest into the form of passive aggressive behaviors such as power plays, blaming one another, attendance issues as well as withholding vital information from the group.According to Myers (2008) when two or more people interact their perceived needs and goals may conflict, indeed the goal in a team is to achieve the best outcome, though some people may have a different perception of that outcome or how to achieve it. Conflict Resolution Strategies (Article) The article outlines the conflict resolution process with a wide variety of behaviors including problem solving skills, communication, understanding the positions of others, as well as dealing with emotions (Behfar, Peterson, Mannix, and Trochim, 2008).The actual strategies include open communication, discuss or debate, and compromise and consensus w here each party says what is on their mind and work out the issue from there, the team goes through each solution and determined which was the easiest to defend with the information given or instead of debating the team focuses on compromise; rotating responsibilities, when the team changes or rotates responsibilities to foresee member conflicts, for example, â€Å"we tried a new way of working together that better considered our busy schedules† or â€Å"we plotted out our busy times before the deadline and avoided meeting during those times† (Behfar, Peterson, Mannix, and Trochim, 2008); Avoiding the conflict, the teams divided the work so the people that had a conflict never had to work directly together which is not the ideal usage of conflict resolution based on the fact that the conflict is only being ignored rather than solved. Conflict Resolution Strategies (Textbook)The text has similar ideas such as contact with one another, putting the group together can caus e a more tolerant attitude; cooperation, people having a common goal and working together to achieve it; communication, people can bargain (seek an agreement to a conflict through direct negotiation between the people) seek mediation (an attempt by a neutral person to resolve a conflict by facilitating communication and offering suggestions) or they can arbitrate (resolution of a conflict by a third and neutral person who studies both sides of the conflict and imposes a settlement); lastly is conciliation, this means that each party is not willing to just turn and walk away so one party slows steps back and in return as does the other party, it can be described as not turning their backs to each other but cautiously walking away. Article Conclusion Results of the study showed that majority rule voting was associated with high and increased task performance but had a low and decreasing member satisfaction.These results show that it is beneficial to all members and performance to reso lve conflict rather than ignoring or avoiding it, if two members of the team believe that he or she is not being heard (perceived injustice) then he or she will be unhappy in the group and in turn can cause further conflict within the group as previous examples show; passive aggressive behaviors such as power plays, blaming one another, attendance issues as well as withholding vital information from the group. The teams that were high and increasing in performance and member satisfaction developed equity, not necessarily equal, but a suitable way for all members of the team to contribute given any restrictions.The idea is for the performance and member satisfaction to be at its highest, to do so members of the team must keep this in mind when discussing contributions and ideas. The conclusion of the study is parallel to what would make sense as read in Myers textbook. If the proper steps are taken, most conflicts can be resolved through the conflict resolution and peacemaking elements. Conclusion The chosen article and the textbook discussed the same elements of conflict resolution and peacemaking, though described in alternative terms, the concepts were the same. There are several ways conflict can occur and with that there are several ways conflicts can be managed or solved. The conflict resolution strategy used would depend on the type of conflict as well as the type of people or behav iors involved. The main elements of conflict resolution are contact, cooperation, communication which includes bargaining, mediation, and arbitration, and finally conciliation. Within these elements several approaches can be used to resolve conflict. The ideal situation would be all members involved in the conflict walk away feeling that he or she has been satisfied but not necessarily that he or she has won.References Behfar, K. J. , Peterson, R. S. , Mannix, E. A. , Trochim, W. M. (2008). The Critical Role of Conflict Resolution in Team: A Close Look at the Links Between Conflict Tyoe, Conflict Management Strategies, and Team Outlooks. Journal of Applied Psychology , 170-188. Meyers, D. G. (2008). Social Psychology. New York City : McGraw-Hill. How to cite Conflict Mediation and Peacemaking, Papers

Philosophy Of The Human Mind Truth Essay Example For Students

Philosophy Of The Human Mind: Truth Essay TABLE OF CONTENTS1. THE PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT OF TRUTH2. THE ACHIEVEMENT OF TRUTH1. THE PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT OF TRUTHEpistemology is the study of what we know, how we know, and what we can or cannot know. In Epistemology, students are asked many questions about Truth and Knowledge. Here are two basic questions that students may be asked, What is Truth? and Can we really have Truth? The simple answer to this question is yes. Truth, in a philosophical term is defined as What the universe actually is not what one thinks it is or is not. An opinion in philosophy does not count. Good philosophers must be able to reason to others what they claiming are true. Everyone has his/her own opinions. If we allowed opinions in philosophy, then there can be no such thing as truth. If everyone has his/her own opinions, what can be true for you may not be true for me and vice versa. Being skeptical and saying that we can never know the truth does not change the way the universe actually is to somethi ng that it isnt. For instance, if I never went outside of my house or look outside my window, I will never know that the sky is blue. Even though, I do not know that the sky is blue, it doesnt change the fact that the sky is actually blue. Now, I would like to discuss with you two types of Truth. The first type of Truth is called Normative Truth, and second type of Truth is called Descriptive Truth. Normative Truth is Permanent Truth; Descriptive Truth is Temporary Truth. Here is an example of Descriptive Truth I am in Toronto This is currently true, but what if I move to New York? Here is another example of Descriptive Truth The CN Tower is located in Toronto This is currently true, but what if The CN Tower was moved to Montreal or destroyed? Than the statement, The CN Tower is located in Toronto is false. The other type of Truth is Normative Truth. Normative Truth is what the universe actually is, or what it actually holds. For example, The Sky is blue, 2 * 3, 1 + 1 = 2, Elephants are bigger than rabbits These are all normative Truths. We know that Rabbits can never be bigger than Elephants, or that 2 can never be greater than 3. These statements will always remain true unlike statements like The CN Tower is located in Toronto (Note: Descriptive Truth is not someones opinion. The CN Tower is located in Toronto is known as Descriptive Truth, but is this someones pinion? of course not!)Now that you know about Normative and Descriptive Truth, what you should also know are the three rock-bottom rules of Logic. Here are the three rules. Rule # 1: The law of Non-Contradiction(Nothing can both be and not be at the same time and in the same sense) Rule # 2: The Law of Excluded Middle(Something either is, or it is not) Rule # 3: The Law of Identity(Something is what it is). Notice: These are the three basic rules that every philosopher must know about. In rule # 2, it states that Something either is or it not You have to understand that Rule # 2 only applies to general concepts not specific concepts. For instance, the colour gray is not really black or white. Gray is a colour in between of black and white. If rule # 2 applies, than the colour gray would violate rule # 2, right? No, of course not! Fundamental rules apply only to general concepts. The colour gray does not violate rule # 2 because gray is a specific thing. If gray violates rule # 2, then I guess colours in between of red and blue would also violate rule # 2. I also guess that 1.5 would violate rule # 2, because it isnt 1 nor is it 2. (No! It does not viol ate rule #2. None of them do violate Rule # 2) Here are examples of the fundamental rules. I am either male or I am female. (I cannot be both male and female at the same time) This is Rule # 1I am either alive or I am dead. (I cannot be in between of being alive and being dead) This is Rule # 2I am a human being. (Thus I cannot be a rabbit) This is Rule # 3Many philosophers use logic to reason with other philosophers about what they are trying to claim. For instance, you may have already known this well famous logic statement:If P then QP, therefore Q. (TRUE)If P then Q. NOT Q, therefore NOT P (TRUE)Here is one example: Let P = I started the fire, Let Q = The fire has been started. For the first example, if P then Q, P, therefore Q. If I started the fire, then the fire has been started For the second example, if NOT Q, therefore NOT P. If the fire hasnt been started, then I havent started the fireIn both of these examples, the statements are true. Here is another example. Let P = It is cloudyLet Q = It is rainingif P then Q, if It is cloudy then It is rainingP, therefore Q It is cloudy, therefore it is raining For this statement, the logic is true. Expressive Arts Activity EssayIf NOT Q, then NOT P. if it is not raining, then it is not cloudyNOT Q, therefore NOT P. Not raining, therefore not cloudy (FALSE*)* Even though, the logic is CORRECT, Not Q, therefore Not P the statement made here is incorrect. As we know, there can be days where it is cloudy but there arent any rains. Also, there can be days where it is snowing and cloudy. Therefore, you must be able to distinguish between what is right and what is not. Logic does not play a role in everything. You cannot use logic for everything. if you do, then you arent really learning anything in life but just memorizing things. Try to understand concepts not memorize them. The real world and its problems are not as easy as those in the textbooks. Next, I would like to discuss about Appearance and Reality. As you know, being human has it disadvantaged. The disadvantage is that we may not be able to hear nor see what other animals can. Hence, when we talk about truth, it is only within the contents of our ability to perceive what is out there. An analogy is: A fish in a pond can never know about the world above the pond Non-philosophers are like people who live in caves all their lives; they think what they say is correct, they believe what they think is correct, etc but is it? (thats a question I will leave for you to decide upon). What I am trying to do is, move you outside of this cave. Sure, we may have disadvantage of not being able to hear or see what other animals can. However, the fact that we know this is a good thing. With technology and science, we can build devices that will allow us to hear and see things in which we normally would not be able to doWhy is Appearance and Reality so important related to truth? Becau se if we are restricted to what we can and cannot see, then what we saying is limited to our ability to perceive this world and this universe as a whole. Thus, Appearance and Reality teaches us that what we see or know may not be the whole truth, but just half of the truth. However, you must not say that If we are limited to what we can perceive, then why go so in-depth in trying to find the truth? Even, though we are limited to what we can and cannot see, the fact that we know this gives us an advantage. The fact that we know that we cannot see or hear things that other animals can, is something very useful to us. With technology and science, we can build devices that will let us see and hear things that we may never see or hear. Furthermore, You must know that there are certain things that we may never know about the universe. What we have to do is reason with others what we are claiming is true. Metaphysics is one branch of philosophy that deals with restrictions. If you are majoring in philosophy, this is one of the branches of philosophy in which you must learn. Metaphysics, to put it, is the basic of Philosophy. Understanding where to draw the line is one of the keys in doing philosophy. There are a right ways of doing philosophy and a wrong ways of doing philosophy. Philosophy is something that everyone does; whether or not people do it correctly is another topic. For instance, it is redundant to ask the question Who created God? Because if you asked, Who created God? The other person in his/her rights can ask you Who created the thing/element that created God? So, as you can see, the question can never be answer. Thus, being a philosopher, you must be able to understand that there are certain things th at you cannot ask or know about. (Why? because it is impossible to know about these things)In addition to all of these, Words are also very important in philosophical concept of truth. You must be able to distinguish the meaning of what your speaker is trying to say when he is using a word. For instance, when I say Canadian need changes What do I mean by Changes? These are the things that you must be able to figure out. A good course to study is, Critical Thinking. Before you learn about Epistemology, I would recommend that you study Critical Thinking. I will say this again, Knowledge is Truth. There are no such things as false knowledge. Over 200 years ago, many people believed that the Sun rotated around the Earth; this is not true but only an assumption of what people in those days believed to be true. As we move into deeply thoughts and ask deep questions, we must be aware that we will be ignorant. Being aware of our limitations and restrictions allows us to draw lines between what we can know and what we cannot know. For instance, chemistry students learn that not all elements bond to other elements to produce a compound. However, if a student did not know about this, he could spend thirty years or more trying to force two elements to go together and would never be successful in doing it. Thus, you must know there are certain things that we cannot ask or hope to achieve. How is it possible that we can ask questions in which we never have an answer to? To find the answer to this question, you might want to study Immanuel Kants philosophy. Please note, Immanuel Kants philosophy is very complex to understand fully as a whole. 2. THE ACHIEVEMENT OF TRUTHAccording to psychology, if a child is locked up in a room where he is not taught anything new nor allowed to communicate with anyone else, this child would only know what he knew before he was locked up. If we locked up one hundred children in a dark-room, later set them free when they become adults, these young adults would know less than someone who is in grade two. Therefore, it is very important to notice that environment factors play a role in knowledge as well. The question is now: Do we create truth or search for? To answer this question, I will give you an analogy. Think of the human mind as a large empty-box. If nothing goes inside the box, the box will always remain empty. Thus if we do not want an empty box, we must put something inside the box. To answer the question, Do we create truth or search for it? The answer is both. It just depends on how you look at it. Truth is search for when you have nothing inside the box and suddenly put something inside of it. We create truth when we use the information inside of the box to built something new Let me introduce you to two worlds. Empirical and Theoretical. Think of the world of Empirical knowledge, as something that you can test by using scientific methods to prove what you are saying is true. For instance, if you want to prove that X is larger than Y, what you would do is weight both X and Y. If X is really larger than Y, then the measuring machine display would show this and your claim would be proven. The other world is called the world of Theoretical knowledge. In this world, it is hard to prove that something is true or false. Even though it may be hard to prove, it is not impossible. The reason why it is hard is because we lack the necessary equipments, the necessary knowledge to prove what we are saying is true/false. The world of Theoretical knowledge will come to be t he world of Empirical knowledge if we have the equipment to prove what we are claming is true/false. Do you remember that I told you, Over 200 years ago, people believe that the Sun rotated around the Earth? (Which is of course, FALSE). If you had to classified the minds of the worlds these people were in, you would classified the world of Theoretical Knowledge Why? Because when these people say that the Sun rotated around the Earth, they did not have any scientific proof as to what they are saying. When technologies were available to them, they finally knew what they were saying was false. Please note that something that is in the world of Theoretical knowledge is just as good as that in the world of Empirical knowledge The question is now, how is the world of Theoretical knowledge created? The question is very complex. What I will tell you is that mathematics has something to do with the creation of this world. It is mathematics that help us enter the world of Theoretical knowledg e. When you were taught mathematics for the first time, your math teacher would probably say you that 1 + 1 equals 2. In addition to saying this, she would probably hold up one block and say 1 and then show you another block and say 1 plus 1 is two (holding two blocks up). For the first time, you might relate the concept 1 to the first block that she was holding up, and the concept 2 to the second box. This is incorrect. However, as you grow up and the more you learn, you realizes that the concept one is not linked to the block, but the block is just one (out of many) representation of the number 1 It is at this point, when you realized this, that your mind is in the creation of the World of Theoretical knowledge. To expand the Theoretical world, one must expand his knowledge in mathematics and in science. It is impossible to not teach students mathematics and have them enter the world of Theoretical knowledge. Half of the contents in science is very theoretical. I doubt that a scie nce student does not know any mathematics at all. He must know mathematics (I am not saying that he must know mathematics, like a mathematician). Mathematics is the language of Theoretical knowledge. Numbers are the basic of what every scientists and engineers should at least knowPhilosophy